What is learned, and when? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).
Identifieur interne : 000F16 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000F15; suivant : 000F17What is learned, and when? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).
Auteurs : Anne Gast [Belgique]Source :
- Experimental psychology [ 2190-5142 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- diagnostic : Automatisme.
- Humains, Musique, Test de Stroop.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- diagnosis : Automatism.
- Humans, Music, Practice, Psychological, Stroop Test.
Abstract
In the musical Stroop task, which has recently been introduced by Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronat (2013), participants respond to note names that are placed inside musical notes. Musicians respond more slowly to note names that are incongruent with the note than to note names that are congruent with the note. Grégoire et al. propose to use this task to study the acquisition of automaticity by relating musical Stroop effects to the amount of musical experience. I discuss some caveats that have to be considered for these types of analyses. Specifically, I focus on how different contingencies in the learning situation relate to the Stroop effect and on the question whether a long-term perspective is suitable for studying the acquisition of automaticity.
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000206
PubMed: 24449649
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">What is learned, and when? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).</title><author><name sortKey="Gast, Anne" sort="Gast, Anne" uniqKey="Gast A" first="Anne" last="Gast">Anne Gast</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium </nlm:affiliation><orgName type="university">Université de Gand</orgName><country>Belgique</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Gand</settlement><region>Région flamande</region><region type="district" nuts="2">Province de Flandre-Orientale</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24449649</idno><idno type="pmid">24449649</idno><idno type="doi">10.1027/1618-3169/a000206</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001049</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001049</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001049</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">001049</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001049</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">What is learned, and when? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).</title><author><name sortKey="Gast, Anne" sort="Gast, Anne" uniqKey="Gast A" first="Anne" last="Gast">Anne Gast</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium </nlm:affiliation><orgName type="university">Université de Gand</orgName><country>Belgique</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Gand</settlement><region>Région flamande</region><region type="district" nuts="2">Province de Flandre-Orientale</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Experimental psychology</title><idno type="eISSN">2190-5142</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Automatism (diagnosis)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Music (MeSH)</term><term>Practice, Psychological (MeSH)</term><term>Stroop Test (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Automatisme (diagnostic)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Musique (MeSH)</term><term>Test de Stroop (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Automatism</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Automatisme</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term><term>Music</term><term>Practice, Psychological</term><term>Stroop Test</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Musique</term><term>Test de Stroop</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In the musical Stroop task, which has recently been introduced by Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronat (2013), participants respond to note names that are placed inside musical notes. Musicians respond more slowly to note names that are incongruent with the note than to note names that are congruent with the note. Grégoire et al. propose to use this task to study the acquisition of automaticity by relating musical Stroop effects to the amount of musical experience. I discuss some caveats that have to be considered for these types of analyses. Specifically, I focus on how different contingencies in the learning situation relate to the Stroop effect and on the question whether a long-term perspective is suitable for studying the acquisition of automaticity. </div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Automated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24449649</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">2190-5142</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>61</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>01</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Experimental psychology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Exp Psychol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>What is learned, and when? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>71-4</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1027/1618-3169/a000206</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>In the musical Stroop task, which has recently been introduced by Grégoire, Perruchet, and Poulin-Charronat (2013), participants respond to note names that are placed inside musical notes. Musicians respond more slowly to note names that are incongruent with the note than to note names that are congruent with the note. Grégoire et al. propose to use this task to study the acquisition of automaticity by relating musical Stroop effects to the amount of musical experience. I discuss some caveats that have to be considered for these types of analyses. Specifically, I focus on how different contingencies in the learning situation relate to the Stroop effect and on the question whether a long-term perspective is suitable for studying the acquisition of automaticity. </AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gast</LastName><ForeName>Anne</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium </Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016420">Comment</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Exp Psychol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101138477</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1618-3169</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentOn"><RefSource>Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):269-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23548983</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentOn"><RefSource>Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):80-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24449652</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001332" MajorTopicYN="N">Automatism</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnosis</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009146" MajorTopicYN="Y">Music</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011214" MajorTopicYN="Y">Practice, Psychological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057190" MajorTopicYN="Y">Stroop Test</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">automaticity</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">learning</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">musical Stroop</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24449649</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">P88806031216674X</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1027/1618-3169/a000206</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li></country><region><li>Province de Flandre-Orientale</li><li>Région flamande</li></region><settlement><li>Gand</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Gand</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Belgique"><region name="Région flamande"><name sortKey="Gast, Anne" sort="Gast, Anne" uniqKey="Gast A" first="Anne" last="Gast">Anne Gast</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F16 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000F16 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteMusiqueV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24449649
|texte= What is learned, and when? Commentary on “the musical stroop effect: opening a new avenue to research on automatisms” by l. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-Charronnat (Experimental Psychology, 2013, vol. 60, pp. 269–278).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24449649" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |